Is Reshoring the Right Thing to do?

Is reshoring right, asks Paul Cooper, director and industrial manufacturing specialist at management consultancy Vendigital.

Reshoring has become a key focus for many businesses as they aim to mitigate the effects of disruptive supply chain and geopolitical shocks – but is it the right thing to do? Before taking action, they should re-evaluate the factors that informed their current operational footprint and consider whether anything has changed.

The UK Government’s industrial strategy calls for local supply chain ecosystems to be established to help boost the economy by creating jobs and supporting the development of businesses in fast-growth sectors such as advanced manufacturing, clean energy and life sciences. Localising supply chains will also help to reduce carbon emissions from transportation, aligning with broader sustainability objectives.

A significant number of manufacturers are actively looking to reshore their production and bring supply chains back to the UK. A survey by Medius has revealed that 58% of UK manufacturing firms are moving operations from overseas and among these, 90% reported positive outcomes, including cost reductions, and improved operational security and value. However, reshoring is not a one-size-fits-all solution – it presents both advantages and challenges that should be weighed up carefully.

Reshoring can bring benefits by shortening and simplifying supply chains. For example, it can improve operational resilience and streamline transportation costs due to fewer logistical steps and shorter distances travelled. Advances in automation and AI capabilities can also bring efficiencies, making UK-based production more economically viable and helping to offset higher labour costs. Proximity to market can improve quality control and allow for greater responsiveness to customer demands.

Before localising supply chains, businesses must carefully evaluate whether reshoring would be beneficial. They need to assess the end-to-end supply chain considering key factors such as input costs, location costs, inventory, carbon footprint and customer service and consider how these would change. Reshoring can bring strategic advantages such as improved resilience and simplified supply chains, but it could also bring higher labour costs and capital expenditure (capex) will increase due to the need to invest in local facilities, infrastructure, and technology.

Reshoring involves more than just relocating operations; businesses must ensure that local suppliers and production capabilities can achieve the required scale and quality to satisfy market demand. In some sectors, such as battery production, for example, the absence of an established domestic supply chain combined with higher energy costs makes it more challenging to build a business case for reshoring. The need for raw materials such as lithium, which is mined and processed in countries such as Australia, China and parts of South America, also make reshoring less feasible and battery recycling capacity in the UK is still years away from meeting domestic demand.

Shortening supply chains can simplify logistics, reduce errors, and improve response times to market demands. However, reshoring requires businesses to ensure that local suppliers can meet the required standards in terms of quality, cost and compliance. While logistics may become simpler, sourcing local material suppliers could present new challenges. It’s crucial to assess whether local suppliers would have the capacity to meet current demand immediately, as otherwise businesses would have to allow them time to ramp up.

Customer perception of a UK-sourced supply chain can be a strong selling point for some businesses, especially those looking to capitalise on growing demand for locally produced consumer goods. However, this benefit in terms of brand perception should be weighed against potential pricing impacts, as customers may be reluctant to accept the higher costs associated with UK manufacture.

Finally, businesses involved in innovation should also consider the benefits of basing their operations close to their R&D teams. This can help to accelerate the route to market, enabling faster scaling and close collaboration, particularly in technology and AI-driven sectors. By leveraging the UK’s strengths in automation and AI, businesses can offset higher labour costs typically associated with reshoring, enhancing both innovation and operational efficiency.

While reshoring can enhance supply chain resilience, simplify logistics, and reduce complexity, it often comes with higher costs and infrastructure challenges. Businesses must evaluate their operational models, weighing up factors like cost, resilience, and environmental impact carefully. A balanced approach, supported by government incentives, will be crucial to making reshoring a beneficial strategy for more businesses.

similar news

Businesses Accelerate Reshoring amid Uncertainties

 

Manufacturers Choose Regionalisation for Stronger Supply Chains

The World Economic Forum, in collaboration with global consultancy Kearney, has released its latest report, Beyond Cost: Country Readiness for Manufacturing and Supply Chains, highlighting that over 90% of manufacturing executives are prioritising regional supply chain strategies.

Firms have learnt to adapt to recent supply disruptions in recent years like Covid and the Suez Canal blockage, but the industrial landscape remains unsettled by a mix of geopolitical and environmental factors – including a year of numerous elections across the globe and the resulting impact of potential protectionist tariffs. As a result, regionalisation is becoming a key tactic to safeguard against global trade disruptions.

The findings from over 300 global operations executives show that nearly two-thirds of manufacturers are adopting a ‘power-of-two’ strategy, having the majority of their spend sourced across two separate regions. This shift moves beyond the traditional focus on best-cost to include holistic factors such as infrastructure, technology, skilled labour, and sustainability.

Foreign direct investment in low-cost manufacturing declines as priorities shift

The shift from ‘best-cost’ to ‘value-driven’ investment strategies is also playing a key role in foreign direct investment (FDI) trends in manufacturing hubs, with traditional low-cost regions losing their appeal. ‘Adapter’ countries such as Brazil and India, characterised by a GDP per capita that sits below the global average and with a limited contribution of the manufacturing sector to GDP, have experienced a 15% decline in FDI attractiveness as cheap labour alone is no longer enough to sustain long-term investment.

In contrast, ‘connectors’ such as Bangladesh and Mexico which (like adapters) have historically traded on their best-cost status but whose contribution of manufacturing to GDP is higher, have seen the appeal of their inward investment improve by 14%.

‘Scalers’ like Singapore and Ireland have, on average, seen steady FDI growth, up 2% thanks to strong infrastructure and favourable regulatory environments. Similarly, ‘convergers’ such as the US and Denmark have also seen an average 2% increase in FDI, attracting long-term investment by focusing on factors like sustainability and infrastructure.

This shift in FDI confidence aligns with actual FDI changes over the same period. Countries with higher GDP per capita have experienced more significant FDI growth, regardless of the manufacturing sector’s contribution to GDP. ‘Convergers’ such as the US and Denmark experienced an average 295% rise in FDI in the last 10 years, while ‘scalers’, like Singapore and Ireland, saw an average 215% increase. On the lower end, ‘connectors’ like Mexico and Bangladesh saw FDI growth of an average 144%, double that of ‘adapters’ like India and Brazil, which recorded just an average of 74% increase.

Manufacturers are adopting a ‘power-of-two’ strategy

Per Kristian Hong, Partner and Americas Strategic Operations and Performance Lead, Kearney, commented: “With over 2 billion voters across 50 countries having cast ballots in 2024, 2025 will be a critical year for every company reliant on cross-border operations. Plans to accelerate a sweeping range of policies, intended to reset global trade through tariffs and export controls, will require businesses to re-assess their network manufacturing footprint beyond merely low-cost alone. A more complex and nuanced decision-making process is needed, that considers flexibility and a country’s ability to deliver environmental change in line with global strategic priorities.”

Kiva Allgood, Head, Centre for Advanced Manufacturing and Supply Chains, World Economic Forum added: “As global value chains undergo a profound transformation, countries and companies have a unique opportunity to redefine their competitive edge. This report highlights how countries that deploy innovative policies and invest across these seven factors can position themselves as leaders in the evolving manufacturing landscape, driving economic growth and societal progress.”

The World Economic Forum and Kearney report identifies seven critical readiness factors that drive private sector decision-making and shape the attractiveness of a country amidst the global rewiring of supply chains. These factors serve as a guide for policymakers and industries, covering:

• Infrastructure
• Resources and Energy
• Technology
Labour and Skills
• Fiscal and Regulatory
• Geopolitical Landscape
• Environmental, Social and Governance

similar news

Netherlands tops DHL Globalisation Index

 

The Supply Chain in 2025: Trends and Challenges

2024 was a complicated year for the supply chain; from disruptions to shipping on the Red Sea through to rail strikes, port closures and announced changes to trade tariffs by the leading economic power internationally, the challenges to unhindered trade were many and diverse. So what’s in store for 2025? Simon Thompson (pictured), VP Northern Europe at JAGGAER, delves into a dozen major trends.

1. Cost Savings
Cost management and achieving savings remain a top concern for businesses worldwide. Investments in AI-driven analytics will enable businesses to identify cost-saving opportunities across the supply chain by identifying inefficiencies, optimizing supplier performance, and negotiating better contract terms — ultimately enhancing the bottom line without compromising quality.

2. Risk Management
2024 was a complex year for supply chains globally. It saw disruptions caused by Houthi attacks on vessels in the Red Sea, Canadian rail strikes and the closure of Ningbo Port in China due to a container explosion on the YM Mobility to name a few. Whether geopolitical, economic, or environmental, the vulnerabilities of the supply chain have been evident and savvy businesses have made moves to derisk their operations. Using technology and data to improve transparency and communications all along the chain, it is in fact possible to prevent bottlenecks and rapidly identify alternative routes or suppliers.

3. AI and data quality
It’s becoming a mantra that AI is only as good as the data it uses. As businesses leverage AI automation to make processes more efficient, sourcing error-free timely data from across the supply chain can be a thankless task for both suppliers, inputting information, and buyers, analysing it without automation. As effective AI increases the demand for large volumes of high-quality data with transparent and traceable data sources, it will become crucial to leverage automation to drive efficiency.

4. Blockchain Technology
Blockchain technology is expected to play a crucial role in making supply chains more transparent and traceable. With its decentralized ledger system, blockchain offers unparalleled data integrity, making it easier to track the provenance of goods and ensure compliance with ethical and environmental standards. Although this technology is still at an early stage, we can expect the debate to heat up around blockchain in 2025.

5. Cybersecurity
More use of technology, however, also means more exposure to cyber threats. As businesses place more and more of their data and systems on the cloud, it is becoming more and more complex to protect sensitive customer data as mandated by international regulations. Investing in systems and governance to protect the business across all its international operations is key.

6. Regulatory Compliance
Greater consumer awareness of sustainability and ethical issues along the supply chain, in addition to calls for greater user safety and quality, are driving increasing scrutiny from regulators. The EU Deforestation Act 2023/1115 and the US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (H.R. 6256) are just two examples of regulations concerning the supply chain. Organizations must stay ahead of the curve by setting up systems to proactively and simply assess their suppliers along the chain to ensure ethical sourcing, anti-corruption measures, and environmental responsibility.

7. Scope 3
As businesses strive to achieve their sustainability goals, Scope 3 emissions — those indirectly resulting from the supply chain — are increasingly coming under scrutiny as they typically account for the majority of carbon footprint. Improving communication channels with suppliers and gathering information regarding their eco-friendly practices, responsible sourcing of raw materials, and reduced energy consumption, is key to ensuring that Scope 3 emissions are curbed. Shifting the focus from cost cutting to creating partnerships for sustainability is key to creating greater transparency and flexibility as well as an environment that fosters sustainable innovation along the supply chain.

8. Supplier relationship management
More resilient supply chains depend on better collaboration between parties. Stronger partnerships are created through transparent communication channels that make transmitting key information on certifications, potential bottlenecks, low stock or by provisioning difficulties in real-time without overburdening the supplier with an enormous admin onus. Providing seamless and streamlined systems to expedite information sharing can create the ideal environment to develop new strategies such as new shipping routes, new raw or component product suppliers or even co-investment in new technologies and innovation to improve end products.

9. Nearshoring, Reshoring
As the new United States president steps into his role on 20th January, the world will be holding its breath to find out whether the tariff increases threatened on international trade will take effect. With Chinese products risking “an additional 10% tariff, above any additional tariffs”, Mexico and Canada an increase to 25% and EU businesses anything between 10% and 20%, it is likely US businesses will be increasingly sourcing from national providers. Closer to home alternatives, such as sourcing from Mexico would shorten the supply chain and enhance control over logistics, as well as reducing environmental impact by reducing the distance goods travel.

10. Sourcing from Emerging Markets
Finally, another strategy to respond to tariff will be sourcing from emerging markets. This strategy, useful to help diversify and thus risk-proof the supply chain, can also benefit sustainability provided regions with lower carbon footprints or renewable energy sources are selected.

Conclusion

The global supply chain has been put under significant pressure in 2024, and response has highlighted vulnerabilities as well as ideal pathways to resilience. Technologies and strategies taking the lead in 2025 will build on these as businesses continue to bolster their supply chain against volatility and disruptions, while strengthening areas of potential exposure with increased intelligence derived from greater transparency along the entire supply chain.

similar news

Tariffs and Trade Barriers as Top Concern of Supply Chain Leaders

 

Subscribe

Get notified about New Episodes of our Podcast, New Magazine Issues and stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter.